2,000+businesses
Kenyan MSMEs use ClariFi to plan, measure, and perform.
- M-Pesa ready
- WhatsApp-friendly
- Built for project-based SMEs
Client profile
NetBuild Infrastructure Limited is a Nairobi-based company delivering fibre rollout, tower maintenance, civil works, and enterprise connectivity for telecoms, ISPs, developers, and institutions.
Between 2022 and 2025 the order book grew quickly — but payroll slipped, suppliers tightened terms, tax exposure mounted, overdraft limits bit, and site progress lived on WhatsApp while finance lacked a reliable WIP schedule.
The pattern mirrors many project-based MSMEs: impressive turnover masking weak controls, slow collections, stock and WIP gaps, VAT risk, and permanent cash strain.
Directors believed they had a growth problem. In reality they had a financial control problem — distinguishing profit, cash, and net worth while breakeven, margin, and working capital went unmanaged.
The real question
If we are growing, why are we broke?
The board was not facing a lack of opportunity. NetBuild had won major contracts. The issue was weak financial rhythm — profit on paper, cash almost gone.
2025 position
Financial snapshot
Profitable on paper — almost insolvent in practice.
| Indicator | 2025 position |
|---|---|
| Annual Revenue | KSh 185M |
| Gross Margin | 18% |
| Net Profit Before Tax | KSh 4.2M |
| Trade Debtors | KSh 52M |
| Work in Progress | KSh 31M |
| Supplier Creditors | KSh 24M |
| VAT/PAYE Exposure | KSh 9.8M |
| Bank Overdraft | KSh 18M |
| Equipment Loans | KSh 27M |
| Cash Balance | KSh 2.1M |
March to June 2025
In March 2025 NetBuild won three major contracts: fibre rollout for a gated estate, network installation for a private university, and tower maintenance for a telecom subcontractor. Revenue rose — cash stretched.
By June 2025 payroll was delayed, suppliers threatened to stop deliveries, and the bank declined further overdraft support because management accounts were incomplete.
Symptoms
Profit problems
Margin leakage from pricing, costing, and site discipline.
Declining gross margins
Discounting to win contracts pushed margin well below sustainable levels.
Underpriced contracts
Quotes did not reflect full labour, materials, transport, and variation risk.
Rising labour & subcontractor costs
Technician and subcontractor spend grew faster than priced revenue.
Material wastage
Fibre, poles, ducts, routers, and concrete works leaked margin on site.
Weak project costing
Finance could not tie spend to individual projects in real time.
Uncontrolled variations
Site changes were approved informally without margin impact analysis.
Poor pricing discipline
No minimum margin gate — busy work replaced profitable work.
Symptoms
Cash problems
The more dangerous strain — timing mismatches and trapped working capital.
60–120 day client cycles
Major clients paid long after mobilisation and payroll deadlines.
14–30 day supplier cycles
Suppliers demanded fast payment while receivables stretched for months.
Uninvoiced WIP
Completed work sat unbilled — cash trapped in progress, not invoices.
Retention not tracked
Retention balances were invisible until clients released them.
Equipment ahead of cash
Pickups and bulk fibre were bought before projects generated cash.
VAT not ring-fenced
Output VAT was charged but not separated — arrears risk mounted.
Diagnosis
Financial & Control Performance analysis
Gross margin, breakeven, and working capital tell the real story.
A. Gross margin
- Revenue
- KSh 185M
- Direct costs
- KSh 151.7M
- Gross profit
- KSh 33.3M
- Gross margin
- 18%
NetBuild was winning work by discounting. At 18% gross margin the business was a busy fool — profitable on paper but structurally fragile. Minimum sustainable margin for this model is 28%.
B. Breakeven
Fixed costs: KSh 28M per year
At 18% margin
Breakeven revenue
KSh 155.6M
NetBuild had to sell over KSh 155M just to survive.
At 28% margin
Breakeven revenue
KSh 100M
Improving margin reduces pressure dramatically.
Improving margin from 18% to 28% cuts breakeven revenue by over KSh 55M — less turnover pressure, more room for controlled growth.
C. Working capital
Debtors
KSh 52M
WIP
KSh 31M
Less creditors
− KSh 24M
Net working assets
KSh 59M
KSh 59M was trapped in working capital. Debtors and WIP were not managed as assets — they were paperwork while the overdraft funded client delays.
Root causes
Key control failures
| Area | Control failure | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Project Costing | Quotes not based on full cost | Low margins |
| WIP | No weekly WIP valuation | Delayed billing |
| Debtors | Weak collection follow-up | Cash lock-up |
| Procurement | Bulk buying without project cash plan | Excess stock |
| Tax | VAT not ring-fenced | Tax arrears risk |
| Assets | Vehicles bought before utilization analysis | Fixed cost burden |
| Governance | No board finance pack | Poor oversight |
| Payroll | Labour not matched to project profitability | Margin leakage |
Recommended path
Intervention roadmap
Stabilize cash, restore control, then grow with discipline.
Phase 1
Stabilize Cash — First 30 Days
- Freeze non-essential purchases
- Prepare a 13-week cash flow forecast
- Ring-fence VAT and statutory deductions
- Collect top 10 overdue debtors
- Convert completed WIP into invoices
- Renegotiate supplier terms
- Pause new contracts below minimum margin
Phase 2
Restore Control — 60 Days
- Introduce project-level profit and loss reports
- Create job cards for every project
- Track labour, materials, subcontractors, transport, and variations
- Approve procurement only against project budgets
- Create debtor aging and collection dashboard
- Set credit limits by client
- Introduce weekly management accounts
Phase 3
Controlled Growth — 90 Days
- Set minimum gross margin at 28%
- Use milestone billing
- Negotiate advance payments of 20–40%
- Lease equipment instead of buying where possible
- Introduce project acceptance criteria
- Build a board dashboard around profit, cash, working capital, and net worth
Targets
Financial control dashboard
Board-level metrics to protect margin, cash, and the balance sheet.
- Gross MarginMinimum 28%
- Debtor DaysBelow 45 days
- WIP DaysBelow 21 days
- Creditor Days45–60 days
- VAT Ring-Fenced100%
- Project ProfitabilityEvery project above 25% margin
- Overdraft DependenceReduce by 50% in 6 months
- Breakeven RevenueReduce from KSh 155M to below KSh 110M
Governance
Board discussion questions
Question 1
Is NetBuild growing profitably or just getting busier?
Question 2
Which projects create cash and which projects consume cash?
Question 3
Are debtors and WIP being managed as assets or ignored as paperwork?
Question 4
Is the company using bank overdraft to fund client delays?
Question 5
What level of growth can the balance sheet safely support?
Question 6
Should the company reject low-margin contracts even if they increase turnover?
Final lesson
The advisory message
“Do not chase turnover. Engineer margin. Control WIP. Collect cash. Protect the balance sheet.”
A network and construction company can collapse while its order book is full — projects consume cash before they produce it.
ClariFi modules
Related tools for project-based SMEs
Control Spend
Budgets, payables, procurement, and project spend discipline.
Cashflow
13-week forecasts, cash gaps, and collection rhythm.
Portal
Management accounts and board-ready finance packs.
OKR
Align growth targets with measurable financial outcomes.
Sustainability
Long-term balance sheet health beyond the order book.
The ClariFi control loop
Quote → Cost → Bill → Collect
How project-based SMEs replace overdraft-funded growth with margin, WIP, and cash discipline — board-ready, weekly.
- Quote
Engineer margin
Every quote priced for labour, materials, transport, variations, and a 28% gross-margin gate.
Explore → - Cost
Track per project
Job cards capture labour, subcontractors, materials, and procurement against budget in real time.
Explore → - Bill
Convert WIP weekly
Milestone billing turns completed WIP into invoices — no work sitting unpaid on a WhatsApp thread.
Explore → - Collect
Protect cash
Debtor aging, retention tracking, and VAT ring-fencing keep cash out of the overdraft trap.
Explore →
Plan. Measure. Perform.
SMEs like NetBuild
What project-based directors say after restoring control
Illustrative voices from network and construction SMEs — the pattern is consistent: growth without margin is a cash trap.
“Our order book looked great while payroll slipped. ClariFi made us see we were funding clients with our overdraft.”
“The 28% margin gate was uncomfortable for two months — then it stopped the busy-fool projects.”
“Once WIP was tracked weekly, we converted KSh 18M of completed work into invoices in a single quarter.”
Share the story
Storytelling across platforms
One financial-control case study, many audiences — from boardrooms to sector briefs.
YouTube
Boardroom explainer (10–14 min)
- Hook
- ‘If we are growing, why are we broke?’ — a project SME walks through 90 days of financial control.
- Asset
- Whiteboard: gross margin, breakeven, working capital walkthrough
TikTok
Short clips (45–60 sec)
- Hook
- ‘Turnover is vanity, profit is sanity, cash is reality’ — explained on a fibre site in under 60 seconds.
- Asset
- On-screen KPI tickers + site B-roll
Meta / Facebook
Carousel (6–8 cards)
- Hook
- One growing infrastructure SME. Eight control failures. One 90-day intervention plan.
- Asset
- KPI cards + before/after dashboard graphics
Donor storytelling
Sector brief + photo essay
- Hook
- Project-based MSMEs employ thousands — financial control is the missing link to scale and capital.
- Asset
- Sector chart + working-capital recommendations
Policy advocacy
One-pager + talking points
- Hook
- Delayed payments and weak WIP discipline are sector policy issues, not isolated business failure.
- Asset
- Debtor-days chart + procurement timeliness recommendations
Engineer margin. Control WIP. Protect cash.
Move NetBuild — and project-based MSMEs like yours — from turnover obsession to working-capital discipline with ClariFi Control Spend and Cashflow.
